The U.S. president posted a pseudo-scripture sentence on social media on Saturday that could be attributed to Napoleon Bonaparte: “Those who save their own country will not violate any law.”
It’s unparalleled stupid thing for the president – at least no lawyer told him the situation: “Sir President, you can’t go to the public without first getting an environmental impact statement and allowing the 90-day public opinion period required by law The asteroid that destroyed the planet fired nuclear weapons.”
I’m not saying it’s too gl. A US president suggests he is above the law because it is a serious matter for him to “save” his country. When the President and his allies face the existential crisis of saving us, the idea of asking a white horse to save our hero is created by the President and his allies.
President Trump’s best defense Brain and stomach bloating It’s him who is glib. Reince Priebus, who served as White House Chief of Staff during Trump’s first term, said a lot during ABC News’ “This Week”: “It’s for Trump It’s entertainment. It’s a distraction.”
“I’ve already gotten through that,” Pribs added. “In good times, in bad times, the president likes to pull out a grenade on Saturday afternoon, throw it on the floor and watch everyone react. … There are no drawbacks.”
I said this is the best defense. I’m not saying it’s a good defense.
Honestly, I don’t know what Pribs means when he says Trump’s trolls say “no drawbacks.” Give to millions of Americans – friends and enemies – The President’s ridicule of the law is not good for anyone.
The President – all Presidents – relies on a certain level of trust and goodwill, not only from allies, but also from opponents. In a real crisis, the public and the opposition need to believe that the presidential authority is being exercised for selfless reasons. Impressing that you desire a crisis to maximize your power can make it less likely that people believe in their ability to deal with actual crises.
Nevertheless, since Priebus might be right about Trump’s motives primarily for boredom, it is impossible to be confident in the intentions of his Napoleon statement. But that coincides with the more serious controversy: Trump’s decision to suspend public corruption prosecutions against New York City Mayor Eric Adams.
Until recently, Manhattan’s top federal prosecutor Danielle Sassoon claimed that Trump ordered a moratorium on the case because Adams’ lawyers floated political efforts: If the Justice Department will sack the case, the Adams administration will Strongly support the White House’s mass deportation plan. Indeed, Trump’s political deputy in justice, acting Atty. General Emil Bove, debate Continuing prosecutions that would interfere with the defendant’s ability to dominate in New York City and limit Adams’ ability to deal with “illegal immigration and violent crimes” is an effort made by the president and he will save the United States at its highest priority.
Adams and Trump’s Justice Department deny the alleged quid pro quo. Bove even claimed that the Biden Justice Department had reasons for corruption to begin an investigation into Adams, who pleaded not guilty of accepting bribes from Turkish nationals. This means that Biden’s Justice Department is politically despicable and Trump is correcting illegal prosecutions.
If that’s true, people wonder why Trump is not against letting such willing hackers continue to work as federal prosecutors. Of course, the answer is that they are not hackers.
Trump resigned a few weeks ago instead of following the department’s orders, and she joined six other federal prosecutors, all of whom were on the facts and related internal negotiations are biased. The rising conservative star lays out her eight-page justice Resignation letterusing the threat of criminal prosecution to force cooperation with the president’s political agenda, is an unbearable attack on judicial administration. The Trump administration hopes that the case against Adams will only be suspended so that it can still be hung over the mayor to ensure his obedience, which is the definition of weaponization of the criminal justice system. Bove’s threat is also to investigate the threat of resigning prosecutors refusing to comply.
This is Trump’s claim that if the president “saves” the country, he will not be able to break the law. As Priebus suggested, he probably thought it was just an interesting offer. But given what we know, it doesn’t look like a troll, it’s just a confession.
