The Supreme Court seems likely to rule that Ohio women claim work bias because she is straightforward

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court appears likely to fight alongside an Ohio woman on Wednesday who claims she suffered sexual discrimination because she was straight.

The outcome of this case could remove an additional requirement that some courts apply when majority members, including white and heterosexuals, discriminate against majority members, including federal law, who include white and heterosexuals, may be discriminated against, .

Judge Brett Kavanaugh spoke out a solution to the case, which seemed to have received widespread support among his colleagues.

“Whether you are gay or straight, discrimination is based on sexual orientation. The rules are the same no matter which way you take,” Kavanaugh said.

The Justice heard the argument in the appeal of Marlean Ames, who worked for more than 20 years in the Ohio Department of Youth Services.

Ames argued that she was promoted and then demoted because she was straight. The job she sought and the job she held were handed over to the LGBTQ person.

Chapter VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, prohibiting gender discrimination in the workplace. The Trial Court and the Sixth U.S. Court of Appeals for the Circuit ruled against AMES.

The judge’s problem is that when majority members filed a claim for discrimination, the Cincinnati-based Sixth Circuit and several other courts covering 20 states and the District of Columbia adopted higher standards. People accusing workplace bias must show a “background environment”, including decisions or statistical evidence that LGBTQ people make influencing AMES, indicating patterns of discrimination against majority members.

The Court of Appeal noted that Ames did not provide any such circumstances.

Ohio Deputy Attorney General T. Elliot Geiser told the justice that officials who made the job decisions were not even aware of Ames’ sexual orientation.

But even Geiser doesn’t object to the narrow result that seems most likely. “Everyone here agrees that everyone deserves equal treatment,” Gaither said.

His concessions prompted Justice Neil Gorsuch to point out: “We have fundamental agreement on this today.”

U.S. First Law and other conservative groups submitted summary, arguing that members of the majority have the potential to face job discrimination, and even more, because of diversity, equity and inclusion policies.

President Donald Trump has ordered the end of the federal government’s DEI policy and attempted to end the administration’s support for DEI programs elsewhere. Some new government opposition initiatives have been temporarily blocked in federal courts.

The American lawyer, founded by Trump aide Stephen Miller, first wrote that discrimination against members of the majority is rarely “in this era of diversity, equity and inclusion, with few doubts.”

But there was no mention of Justice’s Dai on Wednesday.